With a new version of Firefox depending on at least three separate themes to integrate into dozens of disparate operating systems, I think it’s high time we took a look at the evolution of Firefox’s on Windows XP. With its massive user base, the XP theme should integrate so seamlessly that users would be offended to change it. Mozilla made native-ness one of their top priorities for Firefox 3, but can they walk the walk?
Navigational Buttons
Let’s see how the primary navigation buttons have stacked against their Luna baseline:- Windows XP
- Qute (Firefox <.9)
- Old Winstripe (Firefox 0.9)
- Winstripe (Firefox 1.0-1.5)
- Firefox 2 “Refresh”
- Proposed Firefox 3
Green = Backwards/Forwards
Blue = Reload
Red = Stop
Yellow/Brown = Home.
Being able to associate specific colors with specific functionality was one thing I loved about Winstripe. You didn’t even have to scan for a button of a particular shape or remember a particular position: want to reload? Move to blue. Want to go Home? Click yellow.
Firefox 2’s “refresh” made a crucial mistake that I’m afraid seems to have been reproduced in Firefox 3: the Home button is two dimensional. Physical objects like houses and printers, under the XP style guide, should be isometric.
Notice how in IE6, Qute, and Winstripe, the Home button is tilted to an angle; that’s how it should look. I thought this had been ironed out by the time Winstripe was finalized, yet with Firefox 3 we’re seeing a Home icon almost identical to its Old Winstripe counterpart — which was excised because of its nonnative appearance.
And get a load of reload! And Stop, as well. Those new, revamped Firefox 3 glyphs fit right into Windows XP...
- Proposed Firefox 3
- Windows XP Undo & Delete
Cust, Copy & Paste
I haven’t met a single person who uses these buttons within their web browser.- Windows XP
- Qute
- Winstripe Old
- Winstripe
- Firefox 2 & 3
The Qute icons resemble their XP counterparts, but they’re way too cartoony. Winstripe is better, but I’m not sure about that green arrow. Is it some kind of metaphorical link between copy and paste?
Without a doubt the worst offender here is the latest theme. Since when is Copy represented in XP by a clipboard?! It’s not rocket science:
Scissors = Cut
Double Document = Copy
Clipboard = Paste
Other than the scissors blending into the toolbar, the indistinct copy and paste buttons, and the incorrect coloring of the clipboard... I forgot where I was going with that.
New Tab & Window
Without any XP equivalent, these buttons have been open to interpretation.- Qute
- Winstripe Old
- Winstripe
- Firefox 2 “Refresh”
- Firefox 3
I fully welcome the new icons, though I think the new “New Tab” button looks too much like a folder and doesn’t have a distinct enough color. It should be more beige/tan/brown.
Other Icons
The balance of the icons are a miasma of miscellanea that serve special purposes but don’t fit into any other category.- Windows XP (No Download Manager)
- Qute
- Winstripe Old
- Winstripe
- Firefox 2 “Refresh”
- Firefox 3
The new History button is a worthy successor to Qute and Winstripe. If anything, its more native than the XP History button.
Not having a native Download image has created a series of ideas and theories about what “download” should look like. Its metaphor has always included a down arrow, but results have varied.
I find the new Firefox 3 Download icon confusing. It’s too big, the back part of the gray box-like thing directly traverses the down arrow, amounting to a gray box with a green line coming out of it. I much preferred the Download icon used in trunk builds until just a few weeks ago:
And it’s not like this icon has been removed; the completed download box still shows this icon. In my opinion, this icon is perfect for XP: it uses a native-looking windows hard drive icon under a down arrow. What better metaphor for downloading could there be?
Until Firefox 2, the Print button was always unique: gray, isometric, with clearly defined top and bottom flaps. The Firefox 2 rendition looks way too similar to the FF2 New Tab button, and the Firefox 3 version looks like a flatbed scanner or an external CD drive. Winstripe had the same frontal view of the printer, but used shadows to better define its purpose.
In short, the new theme feels cobbled together in a haphazard fashion without serious thought given to how all the icons would interact as a coherent unit. The shame of it is, Mozilla has an excellent theming community and a competition within it could have produced a much better theme based on popular support.
Unless a lot of images are replaced at the last minute, the most native-looking aspect of Firefox 3 will be the new combined Back/Forward button.
Happy Leap Year Friday!
This is all well and good, but do you still have the ham flavored bubble gum for sale? The 8 crates I bought last year are running out fast.
Jon, didn't you read the little warning label on the side of the crate?! That gum is for children only! Your telomeres can't handle the fun!
Fortunately, our next batch of HamGum (rebranded for your pleasure) contains a telomeric tracer.
I like the new buttons and love how you have done a side by side comparison.
Have a great weekend!
~xo
Lee Ann
Yeah that FireFox 3 ain't looking too wonderful. I wonder if they've gotten the memory management under control? Firefox 2.0.0.11 has some memory issues and issues with a particular format on video embeds.
It would be nice to open 10 tabs and not use over 400 MB Page file usage.
Also that Firefox 3.0 proposed look is terrible. Fugly doesn't begin to do it justice. More like "Mugly Fugly".
At least it's not as faded as the current version. Sadly, they've landed a few changes on the trunk today. Looks like it's gonna get worse before it gets better.
Memory usage got a lot better in Firefox 3. They put in a new garbage collector and it's quite excellent. The theme is the only thing they can't seem to get right.
i like the button from FF <.9 they are snazzy!
Qute can still be used.
I did the exact same comparison with Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Unfortunately they haven't changed their icons for centuries.
PS. You are totally and unreservedly correct. There! That's your one time you'll get to hear that from me.
Hey, the robot is still alive!
Never used fire fox. I am a safari guy myself.
@Rich: The Eastern Orthodox Church didn't like being called fugly either, but what can they expect when their Patriarch is Tazbon Q. Fugleton?
@Michael: The new Firefox 3 OSX theme closely resembles Safari. You might like it, especially with the massive increase in speed.
The IE that came with Vista has the flat, two dimensional house and it doesn't even have any color at all. What a gyp.